The
need for developing housing finance
has received much emphasis in the
recent past, particularly due to
the vibrancy and the future growth
potential of the sector .The rising
demand in the property development
and housing industry has thus necessitated
the development of a conducive macro
environment supported by well developed
institutional and legal infrastructure
to cater to the rising financial
demands of a myriad of players in
the sector ranging from property
developers and contractors to potential
buyers of housing units.
The
Central Bank in its Annual Report
for 2002, estimates the current
shortfall in housing units at 400,000.
However, according to the statistics
furnished by the Ministry of Housing
,Population and Infrastructure,
the shortfall would increase to
650,000 by 2010, highlighting the
need for greater financing in this
sector . In addition, the Central
Bank Annual Report notes that a
substantial number of existing housing
units in the country are of substandard
quality, requiring re-construction/renovation.
The conclusions that can be derived
from the above analysis is that
housing investment in the country
is a significant one, probably exceeding
Rs. 100 billion annually, based
on the average cost of Rs. 600,000
per housing unit.
On
the contrary, the financing provided
by the banking sector exclusively
to the housing industry is relatively
a lower figure. As per the Central
Bank Annual Report 2002, the demand
for housing expanded rapidly in
2002,with the recovery of the economy
and falling interest rates. In addition
to the special housing loan schemes
initiated by the government, public
sector housing finance institutions
as well as private housing finance
institutions further expanded their
housing finance projects during
the year 2002. It has been estimated
that housing finance institutions
granted 83,698 housing loans in
2002 compared to 58,760 granted
in 2001. As per the said report,
State Mortgage and Investment Bank
(SMIB) Housing Development Finance
Corporation (HDFC) and National
Savings Bank (NSB) granted 25,124
housing loans in 2002, in comparison
to 18,994 loans granted in 2001.
Meanwhile commercial banks, namely,
Bank of Ceylon, People’s Bank,
Hatton National Bank, Seylan Bank
and Commercial Bank, together granted
43,677 housing loans in 2002 which
is a 92% growth over 2001 . The
loans approved by all financial
institutions during the year 2003
grew by about 27% and amounted to
Rs.7.8 Billion while the loans approved
by the four housing finance institutions
during the said period increased
by 25% amounting to 4.8 billion.
Hence it is evident that there is
a significant gap between the actual
investment and financing provided
in the country, creating a great
potential for a housing finance
market.
In
this regard it is rather interesting
to note that most of the state banks
are exposed to small loans, ranging
between 2 to 3 hundred thousand
Rupees, while the average loan size
of the commercial banks is around
1 million Rupees.
The
census conducted by the Census and
statistics department in 2001 has
estimated the total housing units
in the country at 4,687,157 out
of which the Western Province alone
accounts for 27.51% of the Housing
stock in the country. Five provinces,
namely Western, Central, North Central,
Southern and Sabragamuwa account
for approximately 76.61% of the
housing stock in the country. A
district-wise analysis as to the
distribution of housing stock reveals
that 7 districts account for over
50% of the housing units in the
country; Gampaha, Colombo ,Kurunegala
and Kandy accounting for 10.92%,10.83%,8.78%
and 6.75% respectively.
Hence
it should be noted that scarcity
of lands, particularly in the urban
areas supplemented by the increase
in population density have prompted
high rise apartment buildings to
evolve as the highest growth sector
in the industry. The development
of construction technology too has
undoubtedly played a distinct role
in the creation of multi storeyed
residential buildings in urban areas
to cater to the rising housing demands
within the fixed supply of land.
According to a recent research apartments
have been identified as a significant
growth sector which had in fact
provided a much needed boost for
the construction and real estate
market in Sri Lanka. Demand is primarily
driven by location and convenience.
Most apartment towers have been
planned at very residential locations
which would otherwise have been
off limits to many people. Many
are priced at the upper market segment,
although the term 'luxury' is loosely
and ambiguously used. Most existing
players have targeted non-resident
Sri Lankans who see such a purchase
as a retirement option. New developments
in the pipelines are marketing to
the working class in Colombo.
According
to the findings of the said Market
Research, general demographic trends
have played an important part in
this demand for apartments within
the city. As is evident with most
players, non resident Sri Lankan
professionals who have worked or
are still working, are buying these
properties as retirement options.
Aged and aging Sri Lankans, who
will migrate from the suburbs to
the convenience of apartments, will
see an increase in the long term,
funded partially by exchanging their
existing dwellings and partly by
children working abroad.
It
is envisaged that as Sri Lanka's
population ages and a majority of
those aged 18-30 begin to migrate,
a significant growth in demand from
the aged sector would be evidenced,
as they see apartments being convenient
and safe. The demand for condominium
housing units, as a more preferred
housing option, also stems from
the fact that it enables a person
to share in the ownership and operation
of a housing development, while
having negotiable title to his own
unit, since the unit owner can sell,
lease, or mortgage his unit to raise
money as in the case of properties
with absolute ownership.
In the context of the current market,
Colombo city apartments continue
to target the higher end of the
market. The findings of the said
research further reveals that Wellawatte
heads the apartments list as the
town with the most number and highest
occupancy. Wellawatte occupies a
unique position, driven primarily
by Jaffna Tamils who sought refuge
from the war and migrant Tamils
who want to own property in Sri
Lanka. This mix has led to an unusual
boom in demand, which also leads
to an artificial price premium.
Crescat,
Ceylinco-Celestial Towers and Premiere
Pacific Topaz remain the blue-chip
apartments of choice in the heart
of the city. They have various options
based on traditional apartment pricing
models, including space and elevation.
Most have also been planned as communities
with retail space been leased out
to businesses which cater to the
tenants of the building. It is difficult
to forecast how successful this
strategy would be, as only Crescat
is in operation and they have a
mall that targets a wider market
than those who live in the apartments.
Empire towers on the other hand
is envisaged to market itself uniquely
as an exclusive residential apartment
tower with amenities that include
a private cinema.
The
latest addition to the high value
apartments within the city of Colombo
would be the Havelock City to be
developed as a joint venture between
Bank of Ceylon and Shing Kwan Group
of Singapore at the former Wellawatte
Spinning and Weaving Mills premises.
The proposed venture with an estimated
development cost of US$150 Million
would consist of 8 blocks of condominium
housing providing 1080 individual
units ,a 300 room hotel with another
200 units of serviced apartments,
a shopping centre, Cineplex, supermarkets
and an international food court.
Despite
the existing scenario, demand continues
to exist for cheaper apartments
within greater Colombo. This segment
shows a large demand trend for the
2-4million rupee apartments within
Colombo city. Unfortunately most
developers seem to want to by pass
this segment for the present as
the returns are not as attractive
as at the higher end. The demand
for this sector is from middle income
earners and is for locations in
the suburbs.
With
the evolution of mutli-storeyed
high rise apartment complexes as
the major growth sector in the housing
industry, financial Institutions
are generally approached by the
Developers and owners/potential
owners of condominium housing projects/individual
units for following purposes ;
• Purchase of land for the establishment/construction
of a multi storied condominium building
• Funding the prospective buyers
for the purchase of condominium
units which have been partly/fully
completed.
Financing
of above has led to many difficulties
on the part of the financial institutions
primarily due to the procedural
aspects covered under the Apartment
Ownership Law Act No. 11 of 1973
(ACT), although a new legal principle
was created with the enactment of
the said ACT for the registration
of title relating to condominium
parcels in condominium buildings,
subdivisions and amalgamation with
common elements appurtenant and
to enable the separate ownership
and disposition of individual title
to such condominium parcels .
As
per the provisions of the said ACT,
the following issues had been raised
by financial institutions in funding
property developers/prospective
purchasers of the condominium units
–
•
Any financial institution granting
the loan facility to a property
developer of a condominium building
would mandatorily require that a
mortgage be executed in respect
of the land as well as for individual
condominium units as collateral
for the loan facility granted.
•
Accordingly, when a condominium
building consisting of several independent
units have been constructed, the
title to all such units will “go
with the land” and shall become
subject to the mortgage already
created in respect of the subject
land. However, as per the provisions
contained in the ACT , such mortgage
is extinguished at the time of registration
of the condominium plan at the relevant
Land Registry.
• As a result, the financial
institutions that originally granted
the financial facility for the purchase
of the land / construction of the
condominium building faces a dilemma
unless a fresh mortgage is registered
(incurring fresh stamp duty) in
its favour, in respect of all condominium
units, subsequent to the registration
of the condominium plan.
• On the other hand, prospective
purchasers of condominium units
would require each unit (together
with the common elements attached
thereto) to be released from any
liens and encumbrances in order
to obtain further financing for
the purchase of such independent
units.
• In order to facilitate the
creation of such independent title
to each condominium unit, it is
necessary to register the condominium
plan at the relevant Land Registry
and open separate volume / folios
in the books of the Land Registry
for each independent condominium
unit.
•
However, as per the provisions of
the ACT, registration of the Condominium
plan at the relevant Land Registry
is subsequent to the full completion
of the entire condominium building
and the obtaining of the certificate
of Conformity from the relevant
local authority.
• Accordingly, a Condominium
unit cannot be treated as having
independent title unit such registration
has taken place. Hence, the transfer
of units or mortgage of such units
is not feasible as per the provision
of the Act since each condominium
unit is not deemed to possess independent
title.
In the above circumstances, it is
evident that the owner or developer
can sell their product only after
completion of the whole condominium
building and registering at the
land registry. This has invariably
resulted in increase in the unit
cost due to high cost of capital.
The position is further weakened
by the fact that even the prospective
purchasers of the independent condominium
units are not in a position to raise
funds from the lending institutions
due to non availability of collateral
until the condominium buildings
are completed and registered at
land registry.
In order to address the above issues
and to create conducive legal environment
for the financing of high rise condominium
housing units, amendments were enacted
by the Parliament of Sri Lanka recently
to amend the Common Amenities Board
Act No. 10 of 1973 and the Apartment
Ownership Law Act No. 11 of 1973.
It
is envisaged that the above amendments
will ensure the protection of the
interest of both lending institutions
and prospective purchasers and also
facilitates property developers
and prospective purchasers to enable
them to raise required finances
at the initial stage of constructions
of the condominium building and
to ease out the risk of lending
institutions in providing financial
facilities to property developers
as well as individual purchasers.
In
addition to the foregoing the said
amendment also empowered the newly
established condominium Management
Authority to manage the condominium
properties and common elements,
supervise and administer the affairs
and activities of the Condominium
Management Corporates, demolish
the unauthorized constructions and
carry out urban renewal programmes
by demolishing dilapidated condominium
properties.
The
salient features of the new legislation
could be set out as follows :
•
Extend the applicability of the
law to buildings already erected
/ to be erected / partly erected.
•
Registration of the Condominium
plan at the early stage of construction
on provisional basis at the land
registry.
•
Registration of partly completed
condominium building having two
or more completed condominium parcels
at the land registry on incremental
basis.
•
Recognition of titles for provisional
condominium parcels of the provisional
condominium property upon registration
at the land registry.
•
Impositions of restrictions on the
titles of the land parcels which
cover provisional condominium property
for the protection of the interests
of lending institutions and prospective
purchasers.
•
Recognition of “agreements
for sale” as effective legal
instruments to be used as collateral
for securing the loans by the individual
prospective purchasers and to ease
out risk factors of the mortgagee
in granting loans.
•
Intervention of the Superintendent
of Surveys in the registration process.
•
Specific Provision for the Issue
of Certificates of title even during
the interim period of construction
/ completion of the condominium
property.
•
Strengthen the capacity of the owners
of the condominium parcels corporation
known as “management corporation”
by empowering the said corporation
with powers to administer land,
manage all common elements, common
amenities of the condominium property
and to deal with unauthorised constructions.
•
Provision for the supply of common
amenities such as water and electricity
to individual unit owners and occupiers
through the management corporations,
properly observed by the respective
stakeholders and the ancillary powers
to administer such services such
as disconnection and recoveries.
In
addition to the foregoing, in order
to ensure that the above provisions
in the Apartment Ownership Law are
properly administered, amendments
have also been introduced to the
Common Amenities Board Act by converting
the Common Amenities Board as a
Condominium Management Authority
with powers to oversee the overall
management of the condominium buildings
in the country.
Despite
the encouraging developments to
the legislation referred to above,
the financial sector still continues
to be conservative on lending to
apartments. As per the findings
of a recent study on the subject
many banks are reacting cautiously
to the new “apartment boom”
and are not aggressively marketing
housing loan packages to this segment.
While some banks are hindered by
certain internal / legal policy
guidelines as to the ascertainment
of independent title to each independent
unit , most others tread conservatively.
Some
of the primary concerns raised in
financing condominium units (which
is vital in establishing independent
title to the units to be financed
as security for the financial facilities
to be obtained) could be broadly
summarised as follows;
•
Although the recent amendments recognize
the registration of all condominium
plans (provisional Condominium plans
or semi condominium plans) at the
relevant land registry, obtaining
of a Certificate of Conformity (which
is a condition precedent for registration)
from the local authority within
whose limits the land is situated
and empowered to approve the building
plan may not be feasible, in the
event of registering a semi condominium
plan.
• the specific requirements
to be fulfilled by the developer
/ owner of the condominium property
as to the obtaining of the Certificate
of Conformity from the relevant
local authority (which is a condition
precedent for registration of the
Plan) is not specified in the amendment
Act since such ambiguities and uncertainties
lead to many delays in the title
registration process.
• the eligibility and the
exact time frame for making an application
for the registration of the provisional
/ semi condominium plan also appears
to be rather ambiguous as per the
provisions of the new amendments.
• more emphasis should be
placed on defining the rights and
responsibilities of the developers
and penal provisions must be incorporated
into the act to punish defaulting
developers.
• in the event of inordinate
delays, provision should be made
in the Act for potential purchaser/s
of the condominium units (who already
have entered into an agreement with
the owners) to remove the developer
/ or take possession of the incomplete
apartment and undertake completion
works at his / their own cost.
• in the event of the owner
/ developer of the condominium property
failing to transfer the completed
units after receiving the stipulated
consideration, provision should
be made for the competent authority
to exercise its powers and facilitate
same.
Above
all as per the provisions contained
in the amendment , “upon registration
of a condominium plan or a semi
condominium plan, each condominium
parcel depicted therein, together
with the common elements appurtenant
thereto, shall be deemed to be absolutely
owned by the person or persons described
in the relevant plan as the owners
of the condominium property or the
semi condominium property, as may
be applicable without prejudice
to the rights of the mortgagee to
exercise the right of execution
of parate or to obtain monetary
compensation, in terms of the law
relevant to such mortgage or to
the right of any other person to
obtain monetary compensation for
any loss suffered as a result of
any mortgage agreement for sale
or interest he had in the condominium
property or in the semi condominium
property before such registration
being adversely affected.”
It should noted that the above provisions
are not uniformly applicable in
the case of provisional condominium
plans, although the existence of
mortgages prior to the registration
of the provisional condominium parcel
shall extend to each such condominium
parcel and no instrument in respect
of any of the condominium parcels
could be executed in favour of any
other party without the consent
of the mortgagee/s.
The
liberalized economic environment
and urbanization process that has
prevailed in the recent decades
has added much emphasis in enhancing
housing and the development of related
infrastructure within the city of
Colombo and its immediate suburbs.
Associated with the scarcity of
land the present situation has demanded
the development of vertical condominiums
in order to address the issue of
housing the population which migrated
to the city for employment and other
economic activities.
In
the foregoing scenario where more
and more high rise condominiums
coming in to existence, it is necessary
to install a financial mechanism
to cater to the potential developers
/ owners of such buildings as also
to the end-users of such condominium
units. The success of any such system
would primarily be dependent inter-alia
on the administration and monitoring
of the progress of the construction
of the registered provisional condominium
property in order to ensure that
the interest of the relevant parties
(the purchasers / lending institutions)
are protected and to intervene wherever
it is necessary to protect such
interests.
In
addition to the foregoing, it is
vital that other contributory authorities,
such as the relevant local authorities,
Urban Development Authority, the
Survey Generals Department should
liaise with the relevant land Registry
to enable the smooth functioning
of the registration process particularly
to facilitate the lending institutions
to consider end –user financing
while the subject condominium property
is still under construction since
the Registrar of Lands has been
traditionally assigned with the
task to act single handedly as the
watchdog to facilitate the registration
/ implementation of the process.
|
A
former journalist for SUN
and WEEKEND newspapers, Delrene
Seneviratne passed out from
Sri Lanka Law College in 1986
with First Class Honours.
She served as the Registrar
of the First Arbitration Centre
of the Sri Lanka National
Council of the International
Chamber of Commerce and the
Administrative Secretary of
the said Council.
Her
career in banking commenced
in 1990 when she joined the
National Development Bank
of Sri Lanka as a Law Officer
attached to the Legal Department
specializing in merchant banking
and business consultancy work.
In addition she also served
as the Company Secretary /
Lawyer for several subsidiary/
associate companies of NDB.
In 1997 she was assigned the
non-performing portfolio of
NDB and was responsible for
instituting foreclosure action/entering
into terms of settlement,
acquisition and sale of assets
acquired by the Bank until
early 2004 in the capacity
of Manager (Special Projects)
A former American Field Service
scholar, Delrene was also
awarded a scholarship under
the Foreign and Commonwealth
Officer (United Kingdom) under
which she pursued Post Graduate
Studies at Queen Mary College
University of London on Law
and Practice relating to International
Commercial Law and Arbitration.
She has also completed her
Masters in Labour Studies
from the University of Colombo
and is in the process of submitting
a thesis on "Legal Implications
Applicable to Female Workers
Under The 200 Garment Factories
Program".
Currently she functions as
the Head of Business Development
at NDB Housing Bank on secondment
from NDB. In addition she
has also been nominated to
serve on several Wages Boards
functioning under the Wages
Boards Ordinance.
|
|